Skip to Content

Setback for Mayor Bloomberg’s attempt to kick out the churches from the public schools

Today, a federal appeals court turned down NYC government’s attempt to block churches from returning to their worship sites in public schools.

By Print Preview

No, Mayor Bloomberg.

Wednesday, a federal appeals court turned down New York City government’s attempt to block churches from renting  space for worship services in public schools. The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals urged the federal district court to make a final decision on the churches’ right to rent public school space for worship services by the end of the school year.

Last Friday, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Loretta Preska issued a preliminary injunction against the New York City  Department of Education attempt to exclude worship services as an allowable activity by community groups renting public school space. The injunction came in response to an application from the Bronx Household of Faith. The judge expanded the force of her decision to cover all religious groups renting space for worship services in the public schools. In a strongly worded opinion Preska said that the Bronx Household of Faith would likely win its case on the constitutional grounds of freedom of religious assembly and expression and that the church would suffer irreparable harm from the city school regulation. She said it appeared that the city government was "targeting" churches for discrimination.

Preska’s preliminary injunction came after the city government told the judge that in their haste they couldn’t wait for her final decision on the case. The city lawyers turned down any informal delay, implying that they were renting out the church space as fast as they could. There were widespread reports from religious groups that they were being grilled about their activities and that the city school officials refused to provide any guidelines on how they determined what are “worship services.”

This week, the NYC government lawyers requested the Second Circuit to block the district court judge’s preliminary injunction. In a two-page order the appeals court declined the city’s request. The appeals court order implied that the churches might keep meeting at least until mid-June. It encouraged the district court judge to act quickly, at least by mid-June.

NYC government’s senior legal counsel Jane Gordon issued a statement calling the 2nd Circuit’s decision "unusual.”

We will grant worship service applications starting tomorrow,” said Matthew Mittenthal, the city schools spokesman, “so long as organizations are otherwise compliant with our regulation on use of school buildings.”

Pastor Bill Devlin noted that right after he broke his fast of 42 days "the 2nd Circuit Court gave us a major victory!"

  • Thank you for the email. I will pass onto to Pastor Devlin. Best!

  • Yeah, Jesus! Praises to your name for blessing the effort of pastor Bill to help these churches by going on such a fast period. Many churches in Cuba knew this and were supporting Pastor Bill and all those being affected by the NY City Government. This is a wonderful family, right?!

  • Tony, that is very surprising! Would it be possible to link to the appeals court's ruling? I could not find it on the 2nd Circuit's website. Thank you once again for your reporting on this.

    Not that this is over, but for those of us who traditionally tend to dislike "judicial activism" it is a welcome change and assurance (at least for now) that our liberties stand. Thanks be to God.

  • I also like this.

  • I like this.

  • NYC Religion Folk - thank you for faithfully chronicling what God is doing in NYC through God's efforts, using broken people to accomplish His purposes in the history of Redemption! NYC Religion is tellin' it!

  • like this

  • God is working!

  • Thank you Jesus, for this wonderful victory.

  • Henry, now that you mention it, we should have included that the 2nd Circuit judges were the same panel of Judges John Walker, Pierre Leval and Guido Calabresi that struck down Judge Preska's ruling in June. This time their tenor was distinctly different, saying that "they hope and expect" that Judge Preska's court "will render its conclusive, final judgment as soon as practical, and no later than mid-June, so that the dispute can perhaps be concluded by the beginning of the next school term."

  • Wonderful news, thank you for continuing the timely reporting. I realize it may have been a different set of judges, but it is ironic that this is the same appeals court that ruled against the churches last June.

  • Again, great work at keeping on top of this situation and giving us prompt reports !!!

Sign up for Journey newsletter!

Privacy by SafeUnsubscribe

Upcoming Features